<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.8" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/lib/exe/css.php?s=feed" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/feed.php">
        <title>Wiki</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>https://wiki.wwwdot.org/</link>
        <image rdf:resource="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/_media/wiki:dokuwiki.svg" />
       <dc:date>2026-04-16T10:24:44+00:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/annexes?rev=1768765518&amp;do=diff"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/background?rev=1768765387&amp;do=diff"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/conclusions?rev=1768765469&amp;do=diff"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/findings?rev=1768765425&amp;do=diff"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/methodology?rev=1768765408&amp;do=diff"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <image rdf:about="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/_media/wiki:dokuwiki.svg">
        <title>Wiki</title>
        <link>https://wiki.wwwdot.org/</link>
        <url>https://wiki.wwwdot.org/_media/wiki:dokuwiki.svg</url>
    </image>
    <item rdf:about="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/annexes?rev=1768765518&amp;do=diff">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2026-01-18T19:45:18+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com)</dc:creator>
        <title>annexes</title>
        <link>https://wiki.wwwdot.org/annexes?rev=1768765518&amp;do=diff</link>
        <description>6 Annexes

← Introduction |
Background &amp; definitions |
Methodological approach |
Preliminary findings… |
Conclusions &amp; next steps |
Bibliography

6.1 Legally binding and non‑legally binding international and EU legal instruments of relevance

(See the full table reproduced from the report.)
 Level  Policy / law  Zero‑pollution  Biodiversity  Deforestation  Horizontal</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/background?rev=1768765387&amp;do=diff">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2026-01-18T19:43:07+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com)</dc:creator>
        <title>background</title>
        <link>https://wiki.wwwdot.org/background?rev=1768765387&amp;do=diff</link>
        <description>2 Background and definitions

← Introduction |
Methodological approach |
Preliminary findings… |
Conclusions &amp; next steps |
Annexes |
Bibliography

2.1 Short introduction to international and EU environmental policymaking and policy instruments

*International level* – Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) such as the
Ramsar Convention (1971) and the Montreal Protocol (1987) are either
legally binding (treaties, conventions, protocols) or non‑binding
(declarations, guidelines).…</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/conclusions?rev=1768765469&amp;do=diff">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2026-01-18T19:44:29+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com)</dc:creator>
        <title>conclusions</title>
        <link>https://wiki.wwwdot.org/conclusions?rev=1768765469&amp;do=diff</link>
        <description>5 Conclusions and next steps

← Introduction |
Background &amp; definitions |
Methodological approach |
Preliminary findings… |
Annexes |
Bibliography

5.1 Key conclusions

# Existing EU and international policies do not forbid the use of citizen‑science
(CCLA/CGD) in environmental compliance assurance.  
# Horizontal (cross‑cutting) policies (Aarhus, Access‑to‑Info, EC 2024) provide the
legal scaffolding for public participation, information flow and access to justice.  
# The most…</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/findings?rev=1768765425&amp;do=diff">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2026-01-18T19:43:45+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com)</dc:creator>
        <title>findings</title>
        <link>https://wiki.wwwdot.org/findings?rev=1768765425&amp;do=diff</link>
        <description>4 Preliminary findings about citizen &amp; community‑led actions and citizen generated data in environmental compliance assurance

← Introduction |
Background &amp; definitions |
Methodological approach |
Conclusions &amp; next steps |
Annexes |
Bibliography

4.1 The regulatory framework for environmental compliance assurance

Two groups of policies were identified:</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="https://wiki.wwwdot.org/methodology?rev=1768765408&amp;do=diff">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2026-01-18T19:43:28+00:00</dc:date>
        <dc:creator>Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com)</dc:creator>
        <title>methodology</title>
        <link>https://wiki.wwwdot.org/methodology?rev=1768765408&amp;do=diff</link>
        <description>3 Methodological approach

← Introduction |
Background &amp; definitions |
Preliminary findings… |
Conclusions &amp; next steps |
Annexes |
Bibliography

3.1 The step‑by‑step methodological process

The analysis follows three iterative steps (Figure 7).
 Step  Description  1 Preparations  Selection of policies, criteria &amp; keywords; development of the analysis template</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
